GIs toolbox

Bibliography

Bellassen V., Drut M., Hilal M., Bodini A., Donati M., Duboys de Labarre M., Filipović J., Gauvrit L., Gil J., Hoang V., Malak-Rawlikowska A., Mattas K., Monier-Dilhan S., Muller P., Napasintuwong O., Peerlings J., Poméon T., Tomić Maksan M., Török A., Veneziani M., Arfini F., The economic, environmental and social performance of European certified food, Ecological Economics 191 (2022), 107244 (2022)

Click here to consult the publication

To identify whether EU certified food – here organic and geographical indications – is more sustainable than a conventional reference, we developed 25 indicators covering the three sustainability pillars. Original data was collected on 52 products at farm, processing and retail levels, allowing the estimation of circa 2000 indicator values. Most strikingly, we show that [...]

Read more

To identify whether EU certified food – here organic and geographical indications – is more sustainable than a conventional reference, we developed 25 indicators covering the three sustainability pillars. Original data was collected on 52 products at farm, processing and retail levels, allowing the estimation of circa 2000 indicator values. Most strikingly, we show that, in our sample, certified food outperforms its non-certified reference on most economic and social indicators. On major environmental indicators – carbon and water footprint – their performance is similar. Although certified food is 61% more expensive, the extra-performance per euro is similar to classical policy interventions to improve diet sustainability such as subsidies or taxes. Cumulatively, our findings legitimate the recent initiatives by standards to cover broader sustainability aspects.

Yeh C.-H., Hartmann M., Gorton M., Tocco B., Amilien V., Knutsen Steinnes K., Looking behind the choice of organic: A cross-country analysis applying Integrated Choice and Latent Variable Models, Appetite 167 (2021) 105591 (2021)

Click here to consult the publication

This cross-country study investigates the relative role of organic labelling in consumers’ purchase decisions for apples and the extent to which behavioral constructs, derived from an extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior, influence consumers’ choices. We apply an Integrated Choice and Latent Variable Model, combining a discrete choice experiment [...]

Read more

This cross-country study investigates the relative role of organic labelling in consumers’ purchase decisions for apples and the extent to which behavioral constructs, derived from an extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior, influence consumers’ choices. We apply an Integrated Choice and Latent Variable Model, combining a discrete choice experiment with structural equation modelling. Empirical validation draws on data from an online survey conducted in three European countries (NGermany = 404; NNorway = 407; NUK = 401). In all countries, price is by far the most important attribute in consumers’ purchase decision of apples, followed by country-of-origin and production method. The results show considerable consistency across the investigated countries regarding the importance of behavioral constructs – attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, trust, and personal moral norms – in explaining consumers’ intentions to buy, and purchase choices for, organic apples, confirming the derived theoretical framework.